Divine Protection and Natural Harm: Theological Interpretations and the Challenge of Assigning Responsibility
- cassie071222
- 3 days ago
- 1 min read
An exploration of how religious and philosophical traditions grapple with the paradox of divine protection in the face of natural suffering.
Abstract
The theological dilemma of thanking God for protection from natural harm, when God is often seen as the source of such harm, is a complex issue explored through various religious and philosophical lenses. Ancient narratives, such as the story of Sodom and the Great Flood, serve as foundational examples of divine retribution and protection. The analysis engages with theological perspectives like Christian determinism, John Hick's free will defense, and Irenaean soul-making theodicy, alongside philosophical critiques from figures like D.Z. Phillips and Paul Draper, who question the morality of divine intervention. Comparative insights are drawn from other religious traditions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, which often distance divine causation using concepts like karma and cosmic justice. Historical and modern case studies, such as Hurricane Katrina and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, are examined to illustrate diverse interpretations and responses by religious communities. The study reveals that while various theological frameworks seek to reconcile divine protection with natural harm, significant tension persists, highlighting the ongoing challenge of justifying God's omnibenevolence in the face of widespread suffering. Ultimately, the unresolved nature of this issue underscores the complexities inherent in faith and theodicy across religious traditions.
Check full text here:
Comments